This link forwarded by a friend opened up a new (re)evaluation of beauty and self-esteem on my part. The preconceived definition was reexamined, and it is somewhat disturbing when you find that your expectations do not match the general concensus. That is neither to say that I have a skewed view of beauty nor an exalted one. Upon casual observation, I still find the attractive attractive, and the less so as they are. But the root of the problem in the study of connection between of beauty and self-esteem, is that, to me, there should not be one.
In the videos forwarded, and in the countless links and forums that followed them, the general opinions expressed hover around the idea to tell these girls that they are beautiful, and there's nothing wrong with their body, face, freckles etc. Note the use of the word "girls", because this problem clearly addresses the female population mainly and directly, and their male counterpart indirectly. My objection to these ideas of accepting beauty (or ugliness as beauty) is that it has a smack of delusion and dishonesty. Understandably, we should not blatantly go along with the convention of beauty in popular, media or in the social circle, but more often that not, these opposites of popular beauty : too skinny, obesity etc are symptoms of uglier problems. Saying a fat kid is beautiful without the right follow-up would mean that he does not have to shed those pounds. And to tell an okay looking girl that she is super hot without the right clarification might lead to vanity in forms of overt amateur modelling activities.
Are we too insecure as a society to say that there are some forms of womanhood that are not acceptable? Are we trying to solve this problem by denying that ugliness is ugly, and try to get rid off that word from any definitions of appearances? Should there not be absolutes just so we won't have relativity?
These small white lies we tell these girls mask the underlying disease of actually associating the worth of someone with their looks. Would we not be better off without that very connection? Would it be more liberating without the beauty=value equation? Self-esteem should not be about being happy the way you look, but about not even thinking about it, because it has nothing to do with your self-esteem.
But of course we should not be that idealistic in defining the solution. Of course we can't change the society's tendency to judge appearances, both on others and in themselves. Men being the pigs that they are, and women, being the sows that they also are (yay equality!), could not help but initially decide based on visual merits. As individuals, a very very high percentage of us decides everyday what to wear, how to look, what could we change about our appearances, because we could not fight our very own judgemental demons. Do we not judge the compatibility of a couple based on their looks all the time? Do we not say that the new girlfriends of our exes are ugly? Do we not put only our best pictures on display?
After much rambling, it would be helpful to state that the point of this whole entry is that the final destination should be the complete elimination of the connection between a person's worth and their looks. This "beauty comes from within" cliche, although absolutely true, without proper usage, would not adequately address the problem. Don't simply blame just the male population or the media for setting these absurd definition of beauty, because they are the effects, not the cause, which is our inherent tendency to judge. Let us also be free to call uggos uggos, not because we are being mean, but because that's the way it is. In an ideal, honest non-pc world, we should be able to go up to a girl and say she is fat or ugly, but that does not mean anything other than she is objectively not skinny and pretty. As darkness is just the absence of light, beauty is the lack of ugliness.
Without a doubt, these campaigns for real beauty are noble in intent, but I still feel we are settling for second best. Hopefully, this is just the first step towards the ideal solution, and a quick fix to solve the immediate problem because even as (if we want to) we are trying to abolish completely the beauty=self-worth connection, people are emotionally and literally dying. As always, we could be part of the solution, and in this case, by supporting these campaigns, just because they are the ones that actually try.
...formerly the blog portal for ex-MRSM Taiping students of the 0405 batch, but has now become the unofficial blog portal cum randomly-updated-webzine for all ex-students of MRSM Taiping.
Contact us at maresmartians0405 at gmail dot com
Ex-Maresmartian? Have your own blog? Want to link to us?We are always looking for contributions and new contributors. Help promote us!.
E-mail us your blog link or inform us here to join our blogroll.
Blog maintenance: Several posts (by the admin) are not up-to-date. Maintenance will be made at the end of the year when we have more time to work with rebellious htmls.
Huwa... very cool arguments Dot..
Although I do not think that things will change in the nearest future with the world's attention to beautiness kept increasing every day.
One thing for sure, if we keep making the world and the worldly benefits as our main priority, we are not going too far in tackling this issue.
That's what i learned from my buddhism class.. dang.. i'm too obsessed with that.. actually that's what Islam teaches us, right? Buddhist just copied it from Islam. Now that sounds better...
wah, is that what we call the magic of make up or the magic of technology?
about Buddha, i learned that he is not considered as a rasul as he did not teach his people of the 'rabbaniyah' concept. konsep ketuhanan...
Biddha x menepati definisi seorang rasul iaitu seorang lelaki merdeka yang menerima wahyu dan menyampaikannya kepada kaum nya.(Correct me if i'm wrong with the definition)
Setiap rasul yang menerime wahyu mengajar kaumnya untuk menyembah tuhan yang satu.
dalam buddha, x de diajar konsep tu.so, pengikut2 die tercari2 tuhan. therefore diorang telah mengadakan pelbagai tuhan seperti tuhan gembira, tuhan perang, dll.
*********
about beauty...i think there are so many beautiful things in this world to see.thanks to God. thats all.
btw gak, nape the model punye gambar byk sgt dimodified?
America's next top model punye gamba lawa je.modified skit je.
hehe america next top model tu ade editing jugak.. most top photographers did some editing in before producing their final image. That's why they shoot using RAW format and use medium format camera like Hasselblad etc.
about buddha, he's most definitely not a rasul, could be a nabi although not likely. people make rumours a lot don't they (or we..). Buddha believe that God is just another category in it's samsaric cycle, nothing more than that. I think tuhan gembira tuhan bla bla tu more merujuk to hinduism rather than buddhism.
tp banyak version jugak tu..
buddha didn't really say that he achieved nirvana, because if he did so, than we can argue his reason for doing that, and thus he will lose his reasoning that when one achieved nirvana, one will not have any attachment whatsoever.
The follower is the one who talk about buddha's nirvana experience. Kinda like people talk about karamat kepada wali.. the wali himself does not talk about it. other people did..
melencong pulak pasal buddha instead of cerita pasal beauty ni.. hehe.. sian pedot dan beuty nya...
anyway Dot, what is this?? "Do we not say that the new girlfriends of our exes are ugly?"
hohhhh
Ahaha aku gembira aje tgk discussion korang. Tak perlu berkira pasal ilmu kan.
"Do we not say that the new girlfriends of our exes are ugly?"
Itu dari kata2 dengki yang selalu aku dengar dari gadis2 dekat sini. lelaki pun sama. Maybe just nak sedapkan hati.